As President Trump prides himself on the “art of the deal,” he now faces intense pressure to make a “no-deal” on a key Chinese demand. Beijing is asking his administration to formally “oppose” Taiwanese independence, a concession that many experts argue would be a strategic blunder for the United States.
The request aims to replace the decades-old U.S. position of “not supporting” independence. This phrase is a cornerstone of the policy of “strategic ambiguity,” which allows the U.S. to support Taiwan without triggering a conflict with China. A shift to “oppose” would end this ambiguity and tilt U.S. policy firmly in Beijing’s favor.
This issue has become a flashpoint in the broader U.S.-China relationship, especially with a presidential summit on the horizon. The fear is that President Trump, eager for a trade agreement, might see a change in Taiwan policy as a relatively low-cost concession, without fully appreciating the long-term geopolitical consequences.
The administration’s past actions have fueled these concerns. The abrupt reversal on some tech curbs imposed on China and the denial of a transit stop for Taiwan’s president have been interpreted as signs of a willingness to accommodate Beijing’s demands, even on sensitive issues.
Rejecting China’s request would send a powerful signal of American resolve. It would reassure allies, particularly Taiwan, that U.S. commitments are not negotiable. As former official Sarah Beran suggests, if a change is to be considered at all, it should come at a very high price for Beijing, such as a verifiable de-escalation of its military threats.
The Art of the No-Deal? Trump Faces Pressure to Reject China’s Taiwan Demand
19